Dindigul Taluk Police Station vs Muthuraj — 71/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG030308592023
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
30846/2023
Filing Date
30-01-2023
Registration No
71/2023
Registration Date
01-02-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No I
FIR Details
FIR Number
484
Police Station
Dindigul Taluk P.S
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dindigul Taluk Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Muthuraj
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No I
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 29-01-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 04-12-2025 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 30-10-2025 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Summary This document contains the depositions of four prosecution witnesses in Case C.C. No. 71/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court I, Dindigul, recorded on 14.05.2024. The witnesses testified regarding a theft case involving the burglary of a residence in PWD Colony where 3 pounds of gold chain was stolen; all witnesses provided statements describing the discovery of the break-in, the scattered belongings, and the missing jewelry. No cross-examination was conducted by the defense counsel in any of the witness depositions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document contains the depositions of four prosecution witnesses in Case C.C. No. 71/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court I, Dindigul, recorded on 14.05.2024. The witnesses testified regarding a theft case involving the burglary of a residence in PWD Colony where 3 pounds of gold chain was stolen; all witnesses provided statements describing the discovery of the break-in, the scattered belongings, and the missing jewelry. No cross-examination was conducted by the defense counsel in any of the witness depositions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts