Dindigul Taluk Police Station vs Manikandan and 5 others — 906/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,341,294(b),323,324,506(ii),326. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG030168272022

Filing Number

16839/2022

Filing Date

11-Aug-2022

Registration No

906/2022

Registration Date

26-Sep-2022

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

8-Judicial Magistrate No I

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

264

Police Station

Dindigul Taluk P.S

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,341,294(b),323,324,506(ii),326
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/2/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/7/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/8/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/9/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationSubramani
Mp/10/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/11/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationSubramani
Mp/12/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/13/2025 Classification : 311 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/14/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/15/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/16/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police StationManikandan and 5 others
Mp/18/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Manikandan and 5 othersDindigul Taluk Police Station
Mp/19/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dindigul Taluk Police Station
Mp/20/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Manikandan and 5 othersDindigul Taluk Police Station
Mp/21/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Manikandan and 5 othersDindigul Taluk Police Station
Mp/23/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Manikandan and 5 othersDindigul Taluk Police Station
Mp/25/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Manikandan and 5 othersDindigul Taluk Police Station

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dindigul Taluk Police Station

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manikandan and 5 others

  2. 2.Pandi

  3. 3.Subramani

  4. 4.Ramalakshmi

  5. 5.Mariyammal

  6. 6.Poolammal

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  3. 12-May-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  11. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  12. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  14. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  15. 25-Jun-2025

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 906/2022: The petition filed by the accused (Manikandan, Pandi, Subramani, and three others) was allowed on conditions. The court permitted the petitioners to cross-examine witness PW7, provided that the cross-examination is completed on the same day of PW7's appearance without seeking further adjournments. The accused were also ordered to pay Rs. 200 to PW7 upon appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  17. 23-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  18. 20-May-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  19. 22-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  20. 15-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  22. 08-Apr-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  23. 18-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  24. 25-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  25. 04-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  26. 21-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  27. 07-Jan-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  28. 17-Dec-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  29. 26-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  30. 19-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  31. 05-Nov-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  32. 21-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  33. 08-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  34. 01-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  35. 24-Sep-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  36. 24-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  37. 03-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  38. 21-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  39. 13-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  40. 06-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  41. 05-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  42. 15-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  43. 18-Jun-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  44. 28-May-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  45. 21-May-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  46. 07-May-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  47. 16-Apr-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  48. 19-Mar-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  49. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  50. 05-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  51. 20-Feb-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  52. 20-Feb-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  53. 09-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  54. 02-Jan-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  55. 28-Nov-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  56. 14-Nov-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  57. 03-Oct-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  58. 22-Aug-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  59. 18-Jul-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  60. 20-Jun-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  61. 17-May-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  62. 24-Apr-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  63. 04-Mar-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  64. 03-Jan-2023

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  65. 06-Dec-2022

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  66. 18-Oct-2022

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No I

  67. 26-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  68. 11-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 906/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 906/2022: The petition filed by the accused (Manikandan, Pandi, Subramani, and three others) was allowed on conditions. The court permitted the petitioners to cross-examine witness PW7, provided that the cross-examination is completed on the same day of PW7's appearance without seeking further adjournments. The accused were also ordered to pay Rs. 200 to PW7 upon appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case