Canara Bank represent by authorized officer G Venkatta ranga mohan vs Razia Banu and one another — 227/2026
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNDG030093802025
e-Filing Number
17-12-2025
Filing Number
9336/2025
Filing Date
17-Dec-2025
Registration No
227/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Canara Bank represent by authorized officer G Venkatta ranga mohan
Adv. S KRISHNAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Razia Banu and one another
Case History
-
02-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Apr-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul recorded the sworn statement of petitioner Mr. Venkata Ranga Mohan on 12.03.2026 in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 227/2026. The court accepted the petitioner's sworn statement and marked documents 1 to 11 as evidence. The statement was read over and interpreted in Tamil in the presence of counsel and admitted to be correct by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 227/2026
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul recorded the sworn statement of petitioner Mr. Venkata Ranga Mohan on 12.03.2026 in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 227/2026. The court accepted the petitioner's sworn statement and marked documents 1 to 11 as evidence. The statement was read over and interpreted in Tamil in the presence of counsel and admitted to be correct by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts