S. Mariadass vs A.D. Micheal Raj — 91/2021
Case under Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A.D. Micheal RajS. Mariadass. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG030091202020
Filing Number
8923/2020
Filing Date
23-Dec-2020
Registration No
91/2021
Registration Date
12-Feb-2021
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No I
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S. Mariadass
Adv. C. Rajasekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.A.D. Micheal Raj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 91/2021 Summary S. Mariadass v. A.D. Micheal Raj The court convicted the respondent A.D. Micheal Raj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of ₹9,00,000 dated 22.10.2020 that was dishonored with "Funds Insufficient" on 23.10.2020. The court found that the respondent failed to pay the amount within 15 days of receiving the legal notice, establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on the complainant's testimony and documentary evidence. The respondent was sentenced to six months imprisonment and ordered to pay ₹9,00,000 as compensation to the complainant, with additional two months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
01-Jun-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
18-May-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
11-May-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
20-Apr-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
30-Mar-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
26-Sep-2025
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
02-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
18-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
19-May-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
23-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
02-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
28-Jun-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
06-May-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
03-May-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
24-Apr-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
22-Apr-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
02-Apr-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
22-Mar-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
02-Feb-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
15-Dec-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
20-Oct-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
18-Aug-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
30-Jun-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
12-May-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
31-Mar-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
24-Feb-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
06-Jan-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
02-Dec-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
28-Oct-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
09-Sep-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
08-Jul-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
06-Jun-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
01-Apr-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
28-Jan-2022
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
19-Nov-2021
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
03-Sep-2021
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
03-Jul-2021
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
21-May-2021
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
26-Mar-2021
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No I
-
12-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2021
Case 91/2021 Summary S. Mariadass v. A.D. Micheal Raj The court convicted the respondent A.D. Micheal Raj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque of ₹9,00,000 dated 22.10.2020 that was dishonored with "Funds Insufficient" on 23.10.2020. The court found that the respondent failed to pay the amount within 15 days of receiving the legal notice, establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on the complainant's testimony and documentary evidence. The respondent was sentenced to six months imprisonment and ordered to pay ₹9,00,000 as compensation to the complainant, with additional two months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts