Inspector of Police,Dindigul Town South Ps vs Rajiv Gandhi — 328/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(B),307,342,506(II),34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNDG030079432025
Filing Number
7903/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
328/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
245
Police Station
Dindigul Town South Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police,Dindigul Town South Ps (Police Station)
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Rajiv Gandhi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 17-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 26-02-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Tirunelveli Sessions Court acquitted four defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 342, 307, and 506(2) in a 2016 stabbing case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that key government witnesses, including the victim-complainant, either contradicted the case or testified that they had no knowledge of the incident, rendering the prosecution's evidence insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Tirunelveli Sessions Court acquitted four defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 342, 307, and 506(2) in a 2016 stabbing case, finding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that key government witnesses, including the victim-complainant, either contradicted the case or testified that they had no knowledge of the incident, rendering the prosecution's evidence insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts