P Ramayammal vs V Sundaram — 2814/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG030057802025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

21-07-2025

Filing Number

5745/2025

Filing Date

23-08-2025

Registration No

2814/2025

Registration Date

27-09-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate No II

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3)
MP/1/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section P RamayammalV Sundaram
MP/2/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section P RamayammalV Sundaram

Petitioner(s)

P Ramayammal

Adv. BALASUBRAMANI M

Respondent(s)

V Sundaram

Hearing History

Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate No II

12-03-2026

Disposed

23-02-2026

Orders

09-02-2026

Await Reports

02-02-2026

Await Reports

05-01-2026

Await Reports

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Dindigul dismissed the petition filed by P. Ramayammal against V. Sundaram, finding no cognizable offense of cheating or forgery. The court held that the dispute was merely a civil money transaction where the petitioner had voluntarily pledged her ATM card, cheques, and bond as security for a debt, and the petitioner's own admission undermined her claim of forgery. The court ruled that any dispute regarding the legality of the debt should be resolved in an appropriate civil forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Dindigul dismissed the petition filed by P. Ramayammal against V. Sundaram, finding no cognizable offense of cheating or forgery. The court held that the dispute was merely a civil money transaction where the petitioner had voluntarily pledged her ATM card, cheques, and bond as security for a debt, and the petitioner's own admission undermined her claim of forgery. The court ruled that any dispute regarding the legality of the debt should be resolved in an appropriate civil forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case