Town North PS, Dgl vs A1 - Mathivanan — 624/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG030053772018

Filing Number

6160004/2018

Filing Date

05-Dec-2018

Registration No

624/2018

Registration Date

07-Dec-2018

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate No II

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

842

Police Station

Dindigul Town North P.S

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 394IPC
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A1 - MathivananTown North PS, Dgl
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A1 - MathivananTown North PS, Dgl
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A1 - MathivananTown North PS, Dgl
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A1 - MathivananTown North PS, Dgl
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A1 - MathivananTown North PS, Dgl
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Town North PS, DglA1 - Mathivanan
Mp/7/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Town North PS, DglA1 - Mathivanan
Mp/8/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Town North PS, DglA1 - Mathivanan
Mp/9/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A1 - MathivananTown North PS, Dgl
Mp/10/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A1 - MathivananTown North PS, Dgl
Mp/11/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A1 - MathivananTown North PS, Dgl
Mp/12/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section A1 - MathivananTown North PS, Dgl

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Town North PS (Police Station), Dgl

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A1 - Mathivanan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 624/2018 Court Decision: The court acquitted accused A1 (Mathivanan) and A2 (Vignesh) under IPC Section 394 (dacoity), finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that they committed the alleged robbery. The charge against A3 (Vijay Jeyaseelan) was abated due to his death. The court applied the principle that in cases of doubt, the benefit goes to the accused. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution established the crime occurred (victim attacked and valuables stolen on 19.09.2018), it failed to conclusively prove the accused's involvement through: contradictory confessional witness testimonies, absence of victim identification of perpetrators, missing CCTV evidence, and lack of corroboration linking the recovered property to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  4. 11-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  5. 11-May-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  6. 04-May-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  8. 06-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  11. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 17-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  13. 16-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  14. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 09-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  16. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 23-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  18. 16-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  19. 09-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 09-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  21. 27-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  22. 05-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  23. 15-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  24. 01-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  25. 18-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  26. 10-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  27. 27-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  28. 15-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  29. 11-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  30. 14-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  31. 30-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  32. 30-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  33. 02-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  34. 02-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  35. 21-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  36. 14-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  37. 07-Mar-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  38. 10-Feb-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  39. 06-Jan-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  40. 09-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  41. 18-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  42. 25-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  43. 16-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  44. 03-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  45. 17-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  46. 03-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  47. 23-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  48. 12-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  49. 29-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  50. 15-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  51. 01-Jul-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  52. 21-Jun-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  53. 19-Jun-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  54. 14-Jun-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  55. 11-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  56. 10-Jun-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  57. 06-May-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  58. 22-Apr-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  59. 08-Apr-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  60. 25-Mar-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  61. 11-Mar-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  62. 27-Feb-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  63. 14-Feb-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  64. 29-Jan-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  65. 06-Nov-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  66. 11-Sep-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  67. 24-Jul-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  68. 29-May-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  69. 24-Apr-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  70. 03-Apr-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  71. 27-Feb-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  72. 14-Feb-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  73. 11-Jan-2023

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  74. 28-Nov-2022

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  75. 19-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  76. 12-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  77. 25-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  78. 04-Jul-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  79. 01-Jul-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  80. 27-Jun-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  81. 28-Mar-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  82. 14-Mar-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  83. 05-Jan-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  84. 27-Dec-2021

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  85. 13-Dec-2021

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  86. 23-Oct-2021

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  87. 12-Aug-2021

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  88. 01-Jul-2021

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  89. 29-Apr-2021

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  90. 04-Mar-2021

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  91. 28-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  92. 31-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  93. 30-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  94. 31-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  95. 17-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  96. 27-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  97. 20-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  98. 30-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  99. 13-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  100. 22-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  101. 08-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  102. 25-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  103. 11-Oct-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  104. 27-Sep-2019

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  105. 13-Sep-2019

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  106. 30-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  107. 19-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  108. 05-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  109. 22-Jul-2019

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  110. 08-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  111. 24-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  112. 10-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  113. 27-May-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  114. 14-May-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  115. 13-May-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  116. 06-May-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  117. 22-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  118. 08-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  119. 25-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  120. 11-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  121. 25-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  122. 11-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  123. 28-Jan-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  124. 18-Jan-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  125. 07-Jan-2019

    Remand

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  126. 24-Dec-2018

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  127. 17-Dec-2018

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  128. 13-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  129. 05-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 624/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 624/2018 Court Decision: The court acquitted accused A1 (Mathivanan) and A2 (Vignesh) under IPC Section 394 (dacoity), finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that they committed the alleged robbery. The charge against A3 (Vijay Jeyaseelan) was abated due to his death. The court applied the principle that in cases of doubt, the benefit goes to the accused. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution established the crime occurred (victim attacked and valuables stolen on 19.09.2018), it failed to conclusively prove the accused's involvement through: contradictory confessional witness testimonies, absence of victim identification of perpetrators, missing CCTV evidence, and lack of corroboration linking the recovered property to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case