Inspector of Police, Town North PS vs Praveen Kumar — 150/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,307,506(2),34. Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Service Pending-Summon Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNDG030039572025

Filing Number

3940/2025

Filing Date

30-May-2025

Registration No

150/2025

Registration Date

02-Jun-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

750

Police Station

Dindigul Town North P.S

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),341,307,506(2),34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Town North PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Praveen Kumar

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 21-May-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 12-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  5. 12-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: S.C. 150/2025 Witness Deposition Record (dated 12.05.2026) This document records the testimony of Prosecution Witness 2 (Sivasupramanian) in the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Dindigul. The witness testified regarding an assault incident from 17.07.2021 involving a vehicle transaction dispute. The witness alleged that after selling a Tata AC vehicle to defendant Prabakaran for ₹1,25,000 (with ₹55,000 as advance and ₹70,000 pending), Prabakaran failed to pay the balance. When confronted at Dindigul bus stand, defendants Prabakaran and Praveen Kumar allegedly assaulted the witness with a knife and grinding stone, causing injuries to his head, back, and shoulder. The witness's cross-examination raised inconsistencies regarding documentation, payment dates, and transaction details. The court admitted the testimony with interpretations provided in Tamil. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 12-May-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 05-May-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 07-Apr-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 04-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 07-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 17-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 03-Dec-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 18-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 05-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 23-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 09-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 19-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 18-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 10-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 02-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 13-Aug-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 05-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 02-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 21-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 03-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 30-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C. 150/2025 Witness Deposition Record (dated 12.05.2026) This document records the testimony of Prosecution Witness 2 (Sivasupramanian) in the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Dindigul. The witness testified regarding an assault incident from 17.07.2021 involving a vehicle transaction dispute. The witness alleged that after selling a Tata AC vehicle to defendant Prabakaran for ₹1,25,000 (with ₹55,000 as advance and ₹70,000 pending), Prabakaran failed to pay the balance. When confronted at Dindigul bus stand, defendants Prabakaran and Praveen Kumar allegedly assaulted the witness with a knife and grinding stone, causing injuries to his head, back, and shoulder. The witness's cross-examination raised inconsistencies regarding documentation, payment dates, and transaction details. The court admitted the testimony with interpretations provided in Tamil. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case