Inspector of police, RPF vs Narenthiran — 580/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG030018312026

Filing Number

1823/2026

Filing Date

14-Mar-2026

Registration No

580/2026

Registration Date

14-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate No II

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

Railway Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of police, RPF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narenthiran

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Dindigul allowed the bail petition of Narendran, accused of theft under IPC Section 379, considering his lengthy custody since September 26, 2025, and willingness to furnish sureties. The court granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, despite prosecution opposition citing flight risk and witness tampering concerns, subject to conditions including daily police reporting for 20 days and non-interference with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Dindigul allowed the bail petition of Narendran, accused of theft under IPC Section 379, considering his lengthy custody since September 26, 2025, and willingness to furnish sureties. The court granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, despite prosecution opposition citing flight risk and witness tampering concerns, subject to conditions including daily police reporting for 20 days and non-interference with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case