Inspector of police, Town north PS. vs Sivapandi, S/o.arockiaraj — 527/2026
Case under Preventionofillicittrafficinnarcoticdrugsandpsychotropicsubstancesact Section 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(A), 25, 29(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 17th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNDG030016892026
Filing Number
1681/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
527/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate No II
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
Dindigul Town North P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of police, Town north PS (Police Station).
Respondent(s)
Sivapandi, S/o.arockiaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate No II
Disposed
Admission
Admission
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Admission |
| 12-03-2026 | Admission |
| 10-03-2026 | Admission |
Final Orders / Judgements
The II Additional District Judge, Dindigul dismissed the criminal petition (Crl.M.P. No. 527/2026) filed under Section 503 of BNSS by the petitioner seeking custody of an OPPO F31 5G mobile phone seized in NDPS Act case No. 54/2026. The court found that the phone was not produced before the court as required, was taken into inventory, and the case is still pending; therefore, in the interests of justice, the petition was rejected and the seized item remains with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The II Additional District Judge, Dindigul dismissed the criminal petition (Crl.M.P. No. 527/2026) filed under Section 503 of BNSS by the petitioner seeking custody of an OPPO F31 5G mobile phone seized in NDPS Act case No. 54/2026. The court found that the phone was not produced before the court as required, was taken into inventory, and the case is still pending; therefore, in the interests of justice, the petition was rejected and the seized item remains with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts