Inspector of Police, Dindigul Town South PS vs Sakthivel — 85/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),307,506(2),427. Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNDG030016732025
Next Hearing
27th May 2026
Filing Number
1663/2025
Filing Date
25-03-2025
Registration No
85/2025
Registration Date
25-03-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
104
Police Station
Dindigul Town South Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Dindigul Town South PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Sakthivel
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 30-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 16-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 08-04-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 27-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: This is a deposition record of Prosecution Witness 4 (Sureshkumar, age 40) in case S.C. 85/2025 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, recorded on 21.08.2025. The witness testified regarding an alleged attack involving a knife by the accused on 11.03.2024, wherein the accused allegedly attacked the witness and his brother-in-law, causing injuries. The defence did not conduct cross-examination, and the deposition was recorded and confirmed as correct by the witness in the presence of counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: This is a deposition record of Prosecution Witness 4 (Sureshkumar, age 40) in case S.C. 85/2025 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, recorded on 21.08.2025. The witness testified regarding an alleged attack involving a knife by the accused on 11.03.2024, wherein the accused allegedly attacked the witness and his brother-in-law, causing injuries. The defence did not conduct cross-examination, and the deposition was recorded and confirmed as correct by the witness in the presence of counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts