S I police Thadicombu P.S. vs Karunakaran — 112/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 21st May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG030013362014
Registration No
112/2014
Registration Date
11-Jul-2014
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate No II
Decision Date
21-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S I police Thadicombu P.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karunakaran
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: CC 112/2014 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Karunakaran of charges under IPC Sections 454 (house-breaking) and 380 (theft), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution established that a burglary and theft occurred at the complainant's residence on May 14, 2012, resulting in the loss of approximately 5 pounds of gold jewelry and ₹27,000 in cash, the court determined that the accused's involvement could not be conclusively proven. The court found critical gaps in the evidence: the eyewitness (PW8) who allegedly identified items recovered from the accused testified that he did not recognize the accused and had no knowledge of the case details. Additionally, while the accused allegedly confessed and led police to recover stolen items, this confession alone—without independent corroborating evidence directly linking the accused to the crime scene—was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court invoked the principle that in cases lacking direct eyewitness testimony, the benefit of doubt must be given to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-May-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
19-May-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
18-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
15-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
14-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
12-May-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
05-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
07-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
24-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
17-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
10-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
03-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
24-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
17-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
10-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
03-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
06-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
16-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
02-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
25-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
18-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
11-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
04-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
14-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
07-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
23-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
02-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
19-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
05-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
05-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
22-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
08-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
10-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
20-May-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
22-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
03-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
17-Mar-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
07-Mar-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
21-Feb-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
10-Jan-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
24-Dec-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
17-Sep-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
23-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
03-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
14-May-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
26-Apr-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
23-Apr-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
19-Mar-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
30-Jan-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
26-Dec-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
21-Nov-2023
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
07-Nov-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
17-Oct-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
10-Oct-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
03-Oct-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
26-Sep-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
19-Sep-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
12-Sep-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
05-Sep-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
29-Aug-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
22-Aug-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
08-Aug-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
01-Aug-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
18-Jul-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
11-Jul-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
04-Jul-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
20-Jun-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
06-Jun-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
30-May-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
16-May-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
25-Apr-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
18-Apr-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
11-Apr-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Mar-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
21-Mar-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
14-Mar-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
07-Mar-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
21-Feb-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
07-Feb-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
10-Jan-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
03-Jan-2023
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
27-Dec-2022
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
13-Dec-2022
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
29-Nov-2022
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
15-Nov-2022
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
01-Nov-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
06-Oct-2022
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
27-Sep-2022
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
06-Sep-2022
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
19-Jul-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Jun-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
21-Jun-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
19-Apr-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
08-Mar-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
25-Jan-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
14-Dec-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
09-Nov-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
05-Oct-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
14-Sep-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
04-Aug-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
23-Jun-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
18-May-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
20-Apr-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
06-Apr-2021
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
09-Mar-2021
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
02-Feb-2021
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
29-Dec-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
01-Dec-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
13-Oct-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
06-Oct-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
22-Sep-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
08-Sep-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
18-Aug-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Jul-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
14-Jul-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
30-Jun-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
16-Jun-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Apr-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
21-Apr-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
31-Mar-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
04-Feb-2020
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
17-Dec-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
22-Oct-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
03-Oct-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
30-Jul-2019
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
02-Jul-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
04-Jun-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
30-Apr-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
26-Mar-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
19-Feb-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
08-Jan-2019
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
11-Dec-2018
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
20-Nov-2018
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
23-Oct-2018
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Aug-2018
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
24-Jul-2018
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
10-Jul-2018
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
12-Jun-2018
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
22-May-2018
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
20-Apr-2018
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
13-Mar-2018
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
13-Feb-2018
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
09-Jan-2018
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
19-Dec-2017
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Nov-2017
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
31-Oct-2017
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
10-Oct-2017
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
29-Aug-2017
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
08-Aug-2017
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
11-Jul-2017
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
18-Apr-2017
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Mar-2017
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
21-Feb-2017
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
31-Jan-2017
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
10-Jan-2017
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
06-Dec-2016
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
22-Nov-2016
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
08-Nov-2016
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
25-Oct-2016
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
27-Sep-2016
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
30-Aug-2016
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
02-Aug-2016
Supply of Charge Sheet/ Copies
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
12-Jul-2016
Supply of Charge Sheet/ Copies
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
28-Jun-2016
Supply of Charge Sheet/ Copies
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
03-Jun-2016
Supply of Charge Sheet/ Copies
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
06-May-2016
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
19-Apr-2016
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
23-Feb-2016
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
22-Dec-2015
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
17-Nov-2015
Steps
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
08-Sep-2015
List / Special List
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
05-May-2015
List / Special List
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
02-Dec-2014
List / Special List
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
22-Jul-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
—
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2014
Case Summary: CC 112/2014 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused Karunakaran of charges under IPC Sections 454 (house-breaking) and 380 (theft), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution established that a burglary and theft occurred at the complainant's residence on May 14, 2012, resulting in the loss of approximately 5 pounds of gold jewelry and ₹27,000 in cash, the court determined that the accused's involvement could not be conclusively proven. The court found critical gaps in the evidence: the eyewitness (PW8) who allegedly identified items recovered from the accused testified that he did not recognize the accused and had no knowledge of the case details. Additionally, while the accused allegedly confessed and led police to recover stolen items, this confession alone—without independent corroborating evidence directly linking the accused to the crime scene—was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court invoked the principle that in cases lacking direct eyewitness testimony, the benefit of doubt must be given to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts