Dindigul Taluk Police Station vs Vasudevan — 433/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG030012762025
e-Filing Number
24-03-2025
Filing Number
1269/2025
Filing Date
26-03-2025
Registration No
433/2025
Registration Date
01-04-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
66
Police Station
Dindigul Taluk P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dindigul Taluk Police Station
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Dindigul Taluk Police Station
Respondent(s)
Vasudevan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 24-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 03-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Tindukkal Assistant Sessions Court acquitted defendant Vasudhevan of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a fatal motorcycle accident case. The court found that while the government proved a vehicle accident occurred resulting in one death, it failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant's reckless driving, excessive speed, or negligence directly caused the victim's death, citing insufficient witness testimony and gaps in investigation evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Tindukkal Assistant Sessions Court acquitted defendant Vasudhevan of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (causing death by negligence) in a fatal motorcycle accident case. The court found that while the government proved a vehicle accident occurred resulting in one death, it failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant's reckless driving, excessive speed, or negligence directly caused the victim's death, citing insufficient witness testimony and gaps in investigation evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts