S.I. of Police Town North P.S., Dgl vs A1-Chinnu @ Chinnasamy and anotherone — 128/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 52(A)CopyRightActand506(1)IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNDG030010522015
Filing Date
03-03-2015
Registration No
128/2015
Registration Date
03-03-2015
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate No II
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
778
Police Station
Dindigul Town North P.S
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.I. of Police Town North P.S., Dgl
Respondent(s)
A1-Chinnu @ Chinnasamy and anotherone
Hearing History
Judge: 9-Judicial Magistrate No II
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 02-03-2026 | Trial |
| 23-02-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Dindigul District Court acquitted two accused (Chinnu @ Chinnasamy and Gopalakrishnan) of charges under the Copyright Act Sections 52(A) r/w 68(A) and IPC Section 506(i) for allegedly selling pirated DVDs and threatening the complainant. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting insufficient evidence that the seized CDs were obtained from the accused, lack of expert examination of the CDs, and absence of credible eyewitnesses to corroborate the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Dindigul District Court acquitted two accused (Chinnu @ Chinnasamy and Gopalakrishnan) of charges under the Copyright Act Sections 52(A) r/w 68(A) and IPC Section 506(i) for allegedly selling pirated DVDs and threatening the complainant. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting insufficient evidence that the seized CDs were obtained from the accused, lack of expert examination of the CDs, and absence of credible eyewitnesses to corroborate the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts