S.I. of Police Town North P.S., Dgl vs A1-Chinnu @ Chinnasamy and anotherone — 128/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 52(A)CopyRightActand506(1)IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNDG030010522015

Filing Date

03-Mar-2015

Registration No

128/2015

Registration Date

03-Mar-2015

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

9-Judicial Magistrate No II

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

778

Police Station

Dindigul Town North P.S

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 52(A)CopyRightActand506(1)IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.I. of Police Town North P.S., Dgl

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A1-Chinnu @ Chinnasamy and anotherone

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Dindigul District Court acquitted two accused (Chinnu @ Chinnasamy and Gopalakrishnan) of charges under the Copyright Act Sections 52(A) r/w 68(A) and IPC Section 506(i) for allegedly selling pirated DVDs and threatening the complainant. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting insufficient evidence that the seized CDs were obtained from the accused, lack of expert examination of the CDs, and absence of credible eyewitnesses to corroborate the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  13. 01-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  15. 10-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  16. 03-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  17. 13-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  18. 22-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  19. 25-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  20. 14-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  21. 16-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  22. 02-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  23. 16-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  24. 23-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  25. 01-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  26. 30-Jan-2025

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  27. 16-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  28. 28-Oct-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  29. 30-Jul-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  30. 13-May-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  31. 27-Mar-2024

    Restored

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  32. 27-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  33. 27-Mar-2024

    Service Pending-Notice

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  34. 10-Apr-2023

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  35. 20-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  36. 13-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  37. 03-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  38. 19-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  39. 05-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  40. 10-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  41. 18-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  42. 21-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  43. 03-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  44. 27-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  45. 15-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  46. 10-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  47. 06-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  48. 08-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  49. 06-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  50. 25-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  51. 20-May-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  52. 22-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  53. 16-Mar-2021

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  54. 09-Feb-2021

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  55. 05-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  56. 10-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  57. 23-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  58. 31-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  59. 17-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  60. 27-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  61. 20-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  62. 30-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  63. 03-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  64. 25-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  65. 16-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  66. 22-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  67. 17-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  68. 13-May-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  69. 15-Apr-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  70. 18-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  71. 24-Dec-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  72. 19-Nov-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  73. 24-Sep-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  74. 03-Sep-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  75. 23-Jul-2018

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  76. 18-Jun-2018

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  77. 16-Apr-2018

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  78. 12-Feb-2018

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  79. 05-Feb-2018

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  80. 20-Nov-2017

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  81. 31-Oct-2017

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  82. 03-Oct-2017

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  83. 07-Aug-2017

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  84. 29-May-2017

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  85. 27-Mar-2017

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  86. 20-Feb-2017

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  87. 26-Dec-2016

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  88. 28-Nov-2016

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  89. 17-Oct-2016

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  90. 26-Sep-2016

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  91. 13-Jun-2016

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  92. 28-Mar-2016

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  93. 08-Feb-2016

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  94. 04-Jan-2016

    Steps

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  95. 14-Sep-2015

    List / Special List

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  96. 13-Jul-2015

    List / Special List

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  97. 06-Apr-2015

    List / Special List

    Judicial Magistrate No II

  98. 30-Mar-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  99. 03-Mar-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Dindigul District Court acquitted two accused (Chinnu @ Chinnasamy and Gopalakrishnan) of charges under the Copyright Act Sections 52(A) r/w 68(A) and IPC Section 506(i) for allegedly selling pirated DVDs and threatening the complainant. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting insufficient evidence that the seized CDs were obtained from the accused, lack of expert examination of the CDs, and absence of credible eyewitnesses to corroborate the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case