J Karthik vs The Inspector of Police Town North Ps Dindigul — 419/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 02nd June 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNDG030010242026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
1018/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
419/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
9-Judicial Magistrate No II
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.J Karthik
Adv. I Edward Joseph Hiller IRUDAYASAMY
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police Town North Ps (Police Station) Dindigul
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case 419/2026 Summary The court allowed J Karthik's petition directing police to conduct a preliminary inquiry into his complaint against five respondents for allegedly failing to return his Toyota Innova Crysta car and issuing threats. The court found that while the matter appeared civil in nature, the respondent's refusal to return the vehicle (which was handed over voluntarily for political purposes), combined with threats and an outstanding ₹40 lakh debt, potentially disclosed cognizable offences of criminal breach of trust or cheating warranting investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
18-May-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
04-May-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
24-Apr-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
09-Apr-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
30-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
17-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
16-Mar-2026
Admission
Judicial Magistrate No II
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 419/2026
Case 419/2026 Summary The court allowed J Karthik's petition directing police to conduct a preliminary inquiry into his complaint against five respondents for allegedly failing to return his Toyota Innova Crysta car and issuing threats. The court found that while the matter appeared civil in nature, the respondent's refusal to return the vehicle (which was handed over voluntarily for political purposes), combined with threats and an outstanding ₹40 lakh debt, potentially disclosed cognizable offences of criminal breach of trust or cheating warranting investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts