Inspector of Police, Town South PS vs Prabhu Endra Prabakaran — 20/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 399,402. Status: Service Pending-Summon. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNDG030006842025

Service Pending-Summon

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

Filing Number

682/2025

Filing Date

23-01-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

23-01-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

FIR Details

FIR Number

561

Police Station

Dindigul Town South Police Station

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 399,402

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police, Town South PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

Prabhu Endra Prabakaran

Diasan Raja

Jeevarathinam

Rajesh

Novsath alias Anand S/O Sejuraj, Bharathipuram, Dindigul

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

19-05-2026

Service Pending-Summon

29-04-2026

Service Pending-Summon

16-04-2026

Service Pending-Summon

01-04-2026

Service Pending-Summon

18-03-2026

Service Pending-Summon

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Copy of Deposition

Summary This is a deposition of Prosecution Witness 3 (a 43-year-old police officer from Dindigul) in criminal case S.C. 20/2025 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, dated 06.03.2026. The witness testified about a 2014 police operation involving recovery of weapons and arrest of five accused persons, with detailed examination and cross-examination by both prosecution and defense counsel. The witness's statement was recorded under Indian Evidence Act 1969, Section 4, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a deposition of Prosecution Witness 3 (a 43-year-old police officer from Dindigul) in criminal case S.C. 20/2025 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul, dated 06.03.2026. The witness testified about a 2014 police operation involving recovery of weapons and arrest of five accused persons, with detailed examination and cross-examination by both prosecution and defense counsel. The witness's statement was recorded under Indian Evidence Act 1969, Section 4, and admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case