Sempatty PS vs Murugan — 2/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147. Disposed: Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court on 08th April 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNDG030000152020
Filing Number
2/2020
Filing Date
03-01-2020
Registration No
2/2020
Registration Date
03-01-2020
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Dindugul
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sempatty PS (Police Station)
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Murugan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Await Orders
Disposed
Await Orders
Service Pending-Summon
Service Pending-Summon
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Await Orders |
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Await Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
| 26-02-2026 | Service Pending-Summon |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dindigul (Case S.C. 2/2020), not a final court judgment. It records the testimony of Prosecution Witness 11, a 59-year-old doctor who treated a patient with multiple head injuries on 11.11.2013. The witness describes eight injuries documented in medical records, but during cross-examination, defense counsel challenges the credibility of the medical evidence, questioning discrepancies in admission times, lack of first-aid documentation, and the authenticity of exhibits. The document contains only the witness examination proceedings, not a final judicial decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record from the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Dindigul (Case S.C. 2/2020), not a final court judgment. It records the testimony of Prosecution Witness 11, a 59-year-old doctor who treated a patient with multiple head injuries on 11.11.2013. The witness describes eight injuries documented in medical records, but during cross-examination, defense counsel challenges the credibility of the medical evidence, questioning discrepancies in admission times, lack of first-aid documentation, and the authenticity of exhibits. The document contains only the witness examination proceedings, not a final judicial decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts