Chinnadurai vs Natarajan — 425/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Amendment Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG010068852023

Filing Number

12293/2023

Filing Date

02-Dec-2023

Registration No

425/2023

Registration Date

11-Dec-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chinnadurai

    Adv. V. Maria Selvaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Natarajan

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional District Judge, Dindigul, allowed the petition to implead two proposed defendants (Papathi and the Sub-Registrar, Sannarpatti) in the partition suit O.S. No. 425/2023. The court found that Papathi, who purchased suit property from the 3rd defendant during litigation, is a necessary party to ensure effective adjudication and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The Sub-Registrar was also impleaded in the limited context of facilitating enforcement of court orders and preventing frustration of proceedings through subsequent property transactions. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  13. 14-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  14. 23-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  15. 02-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  16. 20-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  17. 21-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  18. 02-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  19. 05-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  20. 20-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  21. 29-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  22. 28-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  23. 27-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  24. 14-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  25. 16-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  26. 10-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  27. 11-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  28. 11-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  29. 19-Dec-2023

    Issue of Service

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge

  30. 11-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 02-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 425/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional District Judge, Dindigul, allowed the petition to implead two proposed defendants (Papathi and the Sub-Registrar, Sannarpatti) in the partition suit O.S. No. 425/2023. The court found that Papathi, who purchased suit property from the 3rd defendant during litigation, is a necessary party to ensure effective adjudication and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The Sub-Registrar was also impleaded in the limited context of facilitating enforcement of court orders and preventing frustration of proceedings through subsequent property transactions. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case