Chinnadurai vs Natarajan — 425/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNDG010068852023

Amendment

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

Filing Number

12293/2023

Filing Date

02-12-2023

Registration No

425/2023

Registration Date

11-12-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

Chinnadurai

Adv. V. Maria Selvaraj

Respondent(s)

Natarajan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge

21-04-2026

Amendment

09-04-2026

Amendment

08-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

02-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

09-04-2026
Copy of Order
09-04-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The Additional District Judge, Dindigul, allowed the petition to implead two proposed defendants (Papathi and the Sub-Registrar, Sannarpatti) in the partition suit O.S. No. 425/2023. The court found that Papathi, who purchased suit property from the 3rd defendant during litigation, is a necessary party to ensure effective adjudication and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The Sub-Registrar was also impleaded in the limited context of facilitating enforcement of court orders and preventing frustration of proceedings through subsequent property transactions. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional District Judge, Dindigul, allowed the petition to implead two proposed defendants (Papathi and the Sub-Registrar, Sannarpatti) in the partition suit O.S. No. 425/2023. The court found that Papathi, who purchased suit property from the 3rd defendant during litigation, is a necessary party to ensure effective adjudication and avoid multiplicity of proceedings. The Sub-Registrar was also impleaded in the limited context of facilitating enforcement of court orders and preventing frustration of proceedings through subsequent property transactions. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Dindugul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case