Palanisamy vs The Spl. Tahsildar (LA), Salem — 5/2022
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64to66. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNDG010066702021
Filing Number
2010/2021
Filing Date
23-Dec-2021
Registration No
5/2022
Registration Date
03-Jan-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Palanisamy
Adv. M.H. Kaja Maidheen
-
2.Boopalakrishnan
-
3.Chellamuthu
-
4.Selvaraj
-
5.Muthusamy
-
6.Rajamani
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Spl. Tahsildar (LA), Salem
-
2.Divisional Engineer
-
3.The District Collector., Dindigul
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary In LAOP.No.5/2022 (dated 29.01.2026), the Principal District Judge, Dindigul recorded the cross-examination of witness M. Sa. 6 Rajamani regarding a land dispute in Pusharipatty village. The court examined claims about surveyed lands (Survey Nos. 94/1 and 92/1) and distance measurements, with the witness providing testimony on land boundaries and valuation issues. The order indicates no further cross-examination (मरु विसराणे:- इल्लै), effectively closing the examination phase of this land acquisition or property dispute matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
17-Oct-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
04-Sep-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
20-Jun-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
10-Apr-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
28-Feb-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
11-Jan-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
30-Nov-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
18-Oct-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
01-Sep-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
21-Jul-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
15-Jun-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
10-Apr-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
01-Mar-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
20-Jan-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
05-Dec-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
12-Oct-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
18-Aug-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jun-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
08-Apr-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
25-Feb-2022
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
03-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2022
Summary In LAOP.No.5/2022 (dated 29.01.2026), the Principal District Judge, Dindigul recorded the cross-examination of witness M. Sa. 6 Rajamani regarding a land dispute in Pusharipatty village. The court examined claims about surveyed lands (Survey Nos. 94/1 and 92/1) and distance measurements, with the witness providing testimony on land boundaries and valuation issues. The order indicates no further cross-examination (मरु विसराणे:- इल्लै), effectively closing the examination phase of this land acquisition or property dispute matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts