Palanisamy vs The Spl. Tahsildar (LA), Salem — 5/2022

Case under Landacquisitionact Section 64to66. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNDG010066702021

Evidence

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

2010/2021

Filing Date

23-12-2021

Registration No

5/2022

Registration Date

03-01-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Acts & Sections

LandAcquisitionAct Section 64to66

Petitioner(s)

Palanisamy

Adv. M.H. Kaja Maidheen

Boopalakrishnan

Chellamuthu

Selvaraj

Muthusamy

Rajamani

Respondent(s)

The Spl. Tahsildar (LA), Salem

Divisional Engineer

The District Collector., Dindigul

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

16-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

10-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

25-09-2025
Deposition
25-09-2025
Deposition
25-09-2025
Deposition
25-09-2025
Deposition
25-09-2025
Deposition
25-09-2025
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition

Summary In LAOP.No.5/2022 (dated 29.01.2026), the Principal District Judge, Dindigul recorded the cross-examination of witness M. Sa. 6 Rajamani regarding a land dispute in Pusharipatty village. The court examined claims about surveyed lands (Survey Nos. 94/1 and 92/1) and distance measurements, with the witness providing testimony on land boundaries and valuation issues. The order indicates no further cross-examination (मरु विसराणे:- इल्लै), effectively closing the examination phase of this land acquisition or property dispute matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In LAOP.No.5/2022 (dated 29.01.2026), the Principal District Judge, Dindigul recorded the cross-examination of witness M. Sa. 6 Rajamani regarding a land dispute in Pusharipatty village. The court examined claims about surveyed lands (Survey Nos. 94/1 and 92/1) and distance measurements, with the witness providing testimony on land boundaries and valuation issues. The order indicates no further cross-examination (मरु विसराणे:- इल्लै), effectively closing the examination phase of this land acquisition or property dispute matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Dindugul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case