Velan vs Sakthivel Advocate - A.Murugesan — 3/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG010066482022
Filing Number
13300/2022
Filing Date
30-11-2022
Registration No
3/2023
Registration Date
03-01-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Velan
Adv. K. Senguttuvan
Respondent(s)
Sakthivel Advocate - A.Murugesan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from the Additional District Court, Dindigul (Case No. 3/2023, dated 09.09.2025) in a property inheritance dispute. The witness provides testimony regarding ancestral property (Thava property) allegedly belonging to his grandfather Karupanan, addressing questions about property ownership, family finances, loans for daughters' marriages, a residential structure built by defendant Shaktivel, and a property settlement made to the defendant's wife in 2012. The witness largely affirms or denies various claims about the property's ownership, acquisition, and use by the joint family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from the Additional District Court, Dindigul (Case No. 3/2023, dated 09.09.2025) in a property inheritance dispute. The witness provides testimony regarding ancestral property (Thava property) allegedly belonging to his grandfather Karupanan, addressing questions about property ownership, family finances, loans for daughters' marriages, a residential structure built by defendant Shaktivel, and a property settlement made to the defendant's wife in 2012. The witness largely affirms or denies various claims about the property's ownership, acquisition, and use by the joint family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts