L.Krishnasamy vs V.Ramana Vivek (Power Agent of Tmt.Nalini) and one another — 295/2023

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR21R54,66CPC. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNDG010066452023

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

12225/2023

Filing Date

20-11-2023

Registration No

295/2023

Registration Date

20-11-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OR21R54,66CPC
EA/3/2026 Classification : Permission Petition Section V.Ramana Vivek (Power Agent of Tmt.Nalini) and one anotherL.Krishnasamy

Petitioner(s)

L.Krishnasamy

Adv. S.P.Balasubramanian

Respondent(s)

V.Ramana Vivek (Power Agent of Tmt.Nalini) and one another

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge

24-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

20-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

08-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

05-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

22-08-2024
Copy of Order
22-08-2024
Copy of Order

Summary The Additional District Judge, Dindigul, allowed the petition to set aside the ex-parte order dated 5.1.2024 passed against judgment debtor Ramana Vivek. The court found the petition was filed within the statutory 30-day limitation period under Order 21 Rule 106 CPC (filed 5.2.2024, next working day after the Sunday deadline of 4.2.2024). The petitioner's absence, being out of station and non-willful, was accepted as reasonable. The petition is allowed conditional upon the petitioner depositing 25% of the execution petition amount into court by 13.09.2024, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District Judge, Dindigul, allowed the petition to set aside the ex-parte order dated 5.1.2024 passed against judgment debtor Ramana Vivek. The court found the petition was filed within the statutory 30-day limitation period under Order 21 Rule 106 CPC (filed 5.2.2024, next working day after the Sunday deadline of 4.2.2024). The petitioner's absence, being out of station and non-willful, was accepted as reasonable. The petition is allowed conditional upon the petitioner depositing 25% of the execution petition amount into court by 13.09.2024, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Dindugul All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case