Sardhar vs Gopal — 2852/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430.1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG010060492025

Filing Number

3750/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

2852/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sardhar

    Adv. S.Manimegalai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gopal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 2852/2025 on March 12, 2026, finding that the petitioner/accused failed to comply with the court's conditional order requiring deposit of 10% of the cheque amount by February 19, 2026, despite being granted an extension until March 10, 2026. The court noted the petitioner's counsel reported no instruction and concluded that adequate opportunities had been provided to comply, rendering the petition dismissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  10. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2852/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 2852/2025 on March 12, 2026, finding that the petitioner/accused failed to comply with the court's conditional order requiring deposit of 10% of the cheque amount by February 19, 2026, despite being granted an extension until March 10, 2026. The court noted the petitioner's counsel reported no instruction and concluded that adequate opportunities had been provided to comply, rendering the petition dismissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case