Poopandi vs Jeyaram — 8/2026
Case under Hinduminorityandguardianshipact Section 8(6). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 02nd April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNDG010060192025
e-Filing Number
17-12-2025
Filing Number
2540/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Poopandi
Adv. Manikandan Dharmaraj
Respondent(s)
Jeyaram
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Enquiry
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 05-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 12-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court permitted the father (petitioner Poopandi), as natural guardian, to sell his minor daughter Pandimeena's 1/3 share of inherited property under Section 8(2)(b) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, finding justifiable necessity to fund her education and welfare. However, rather than the agreed private sale to the proposed purchaser for Rs. 45 lakhs, the court mandated a public auction conducted by an Advocate Commissioner to ensure the best price for the minor's interest, with proceeds deposited in a fixed deposit in her name until majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court permitted the father (petitioner Poopandi), as natural guardian, to sell his minor daughter Pandimeena's 1/3 share of inherited property under Section 8(2)(b) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, finding justifiable necessity to fund her education and welfare. However, rather than the agreed private sale to the proposed purchaser for Rs. 45 lakhs, the court mandated a public auction conducted by an Advocate Commissioner to ensure the best price for the minor's interest, with proceeds deposited in a fixed deposit in her name until majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts