S. Arunachalam vs Jamina — 366/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7, R 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG010054782022
Filing Number
12939/2022
Filing Date
12-Oct-2022
Registration No
366/2022
Registration Date
19-Oct-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S. Arunachalam
Adv. K. Sulthan Allowdhin
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jamina
-
2.Nagarathinam
-
3.Usharani
-
4.Malarvizhi
-
5.Nagarajan
-
6.Meenakumari
-
7.Muthukumaran
-
8.Thirunavukkarasu
-
9.Manimuthu
-
10.Venkatesh
-
11.Sivasubramanian
-
12.Mohanasundaram
-
13.Fathima
-
14.Anbalagan
-
15.Arunadevi
-
16.Deepa
-
17.Lakshmipriya
-
18.Sitharthan
-
19.Karuppiah
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 366/2022) in Dindigul District Court involving a property partition dispute dating back to 1954. The court recorded the cross-examination of Plaintiff Arunachalam on July 31, 2025, regarding ancestral agricultural land that was partitioned among three brothers. The cross-examination of defendants 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 19 has been adjourned at the request of defendants 1 and 13's counsel for resumption at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Jan-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
03-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Jan-2025
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
28-Aug-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
14-Jun-2024
Trial
Principal District Judge
-
06-Apr-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
01-Feb-2024
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
22-Dec-2023
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
24-Nov-2023
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
31-Oct-2023
Issues
Principal District Judge
-
07-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
21-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
22-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
16-Aug-2023
Steps
Principal District Judge
-
12-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
01-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
02-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
23-Dec-2022
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2022
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
19-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 366/2022
Summary This is an Original Suit (O.S. No. 366/2022) in Dindigul District Court involving a property partition dispute dating back to 1954. The court recorded the cross-examination of Plaintiff Arunachalam on July 31, 2025, regarding ancestral agricultural land that was partitioned among three brothers. The cross-examination of defendants 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 19 has been adjourned at the request of defendants 1 and 13's counsel for resumption at a later date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts