Arockia Daisy vs Chelladurai — 94/2025
Case under Special Marriage Act Section 27. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 29th April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNDG010041742025
Filing Number
1781/2025
Filing Date
12-Sep-2025
Registration No
94/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Arockia Daisy
Adv. SHANMUGAM P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chelladurai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Summary The Principal District Court of Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu granted a divorce under Section 27(1)(d) of the Special Marriage Act to the petitioner (wife) against the respondent (husband). The court found that the couple, married on July 3, 2011, had become estranged due to the husband's cruelty including domestic violence, infidelity, harassment for dowry, and abandonment. The court concluded reconciliation was impossible and dissolving the marriage was in the petitioner's best interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 94/2025
Court Summary The Principal District Court of Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu granted a divorce under Section 27(1)(d) of the Special Marriage Act to the petitioner (wife) against the respondent (husband). The court found that the couple, married on July 3, 2011, had become estranged due to the husband's cruelty including domestic violence, infidelity, harassment for dowry, and abandonment. The court concluded reconciliation was impossible and dissolving the marriage was in the petitioner's best interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts