Saroja and other vs District Collector Dindigul — 96/2022
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNDG010035792022
Filing Number
12378/2022
Filing Date
22-Jul-2022
Registration No
96/2022
Registration Date
22-Jul-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Saroja and other
Adv. A.Kalyasundaram
Respondent(s)
-
1.District Collector Dindigul
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary LAOP.No.96/2022 | Principal District Judge, Dindigul | 29.01.2026 The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding a land acquisition dispute involving 1770 square meters of agricultural land (Survey No. 42/1A) in Poosaripatty village. The court found the witness's statements regarding land valuation and compensation procedures partially inconsistent, noting disputes over distance measurements and market value assessment. No cross-examination was conducted, and the matter proceeded to final determination with the court's findings on the land acquisition award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
25-Sep-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
21-Aug-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
24-Apr-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jan-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
14-Dec-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
15-Nov-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
05-Oct-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
14-Jul-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jun-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jan-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jan-2023
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Principal District Judge
-
08-Dec-2022
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
Principal District Judge
-
15-Oct-2022
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
05-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2022
Case Summary LAOP.No.96/2022 | Principal District Judge, Dindigul | 29.01.2026 The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding a land acquisition dispute involving 1770 square meters of agricultural land (Survey No. 42/1A) in Poosaripatty village. The court found the witness's statements regarding land valuation and compensation procedures partially inconsistent, noting disputes over distance measurements and market value assessment. No cross-examination was conducted, and the matter proceeded to final determination with the court's findings on the land acquisition award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts