Saroja and other vs District Collector Dindigul — 96/2022

Case Summary LAOP.No.96/2022 | Principal District Judge, Dindigul | 29.01.2026 The court examined cross-examination testimony regarding a land acquisition dispute involving 1770 square meters of agricultural land (Survey No. 42/1A) in Poosaripatty village. The court found the witness's statements regarding land valuation and compensation procedures partially inconsistent, noting disputes over distance measurements and market value assessment. No cross-examination was conducted, and the matter proceeded to final determination with the court's findings on the land acquisition award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.