M. Punitha vs A. Gnanaprakasam Advocate - A.John Ruban — 45/2023

Case under Indian Divorce Act Section 10(1)(x). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNDG010031162023

Filing Number

1097/2023

Filing Date

01-Jun-2023

Registration No

45/2023

Registration Date

06-Jun-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Divorce Act Section 10(1)(x)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. Punitha

    Adv. P. Suresh Baskaran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A. Gnanaprakasam Advocate - A.John Ruban

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  14. 03-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  15. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    This is a matrimonial dispute case from the Principal District Court, Dindigul (Case No. IDOP.45/2023), dated 20.11.2025. The court examined cross-examination testimony of the respondent (husband) in a case involving allegations of cruelty and abandonment in marriage. The court found the respondent's testimony contradictory and unreliable on key issues including jewelry transfers, financial support, religious restrictions imposed on the wife, and the reasons for prolonged separation. The petition filed by the petitioner (wife) seeking relief under matrimonial laws was allowed, rejecting the respondent's defense and finding grounds to support the allegations of cruelty and mental harassment in the marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 24-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  26. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  27. 23-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  28. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  29. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  30. 25-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  31. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  32. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  33. 04-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  34. 04-Jun-2025

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District Judge

  35. 23-Apr-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  36. 23-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  37. 17-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  38. 13-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  39. 12-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  40. 22-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  41. 20-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  42. 21-Nov-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  43. 24-Oct-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  44. 18-Sep-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  45. 14-Aug-2024

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  46. 04-Jul-2024

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  47. 24-Apr-2024

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  48. 14-Mar-2024

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  49. 08-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  50. 04-Jan-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  51. 23-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  52. 05-Oct-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  53. 17-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  54. 18-Jul-2023

    Issue of Process

    Principal District Judge

  55. 06-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 01-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This is a matrimonial dispute case from the Principal District Court, Dindigul (Case No. IDOP.45/2023), dated 20.11.2025. The court examined cross-examination testimony of the respondent (husband) in a case involving allegations of cruelty and abandonment in marriage. The court found the respondent's testimony contradictory and unreliable on key issues including jewelry transfers, financial support, religious restrictions imposed on the wife, and the reasons for prolonged separation. The petition filed by the petitioner (wife) seeking relief under matrimonial laws was allowed, rejecting the respondent's defense and finding grounds to support the allegations of cruelty and mental harassment in the marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case