M. Punitha vs A. Gnanaprakasam Advocate - A.John Ruban — 45/2023
Case under Indiandivorceact Section 10(1)(x). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNDG010031162023
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
1097/2023
Filing Date
01-06-2023
Registration No
45/2023
Registration Date
06-06-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M. Punitha
Adv. P. Suresh Baskaran
Respondent(s)
A. Gnanaprakasam Advocate - A.John Ruban
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a matrimonial dispute case from the Principal District Court, Dindigul (Case No. IDOP.45/2023), dated 20.11.2025. The court examined cross-examination testimony of the respondent (husband) in a case involving allegations of cruelty and abandonment in marriage. The court found the respondent's testimony contradictory and unreliable on key issues including jewelry transfers, financial support, religious restrictions imposed on the wife, and the reasons for prolonged separation. The petition filed by the petitioner (wife) seeking relief under matrimonial laws was allowed, rejecting the respondent's defense and finding grounds to support the allegations of cruelty and mental harassment in the marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a matrimonial dispute case from the Principal District Court, Dindigul (Case No. IDOP.45/2023), dated 20.11.2025. The court examined cross-examination testimony of the respondent (husband) in a case involving allegations of cruelty and abandonment in marriage. The court found the respondent's testimony contradictory and unreliable on key issues including jewelry transfers, financial support, religious restrictions imposed on the wife, and the reasons for prolonged separation. The petition filed by the petitioner (wife) seeking relief under matrimonial laws was allowed, rejecting the respondent's defense and finding grounds to support the allegations of cruelty and mental harassment in the marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts