Soundarrajan vs Kasthuri — 71/2025

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNDG010030922025

e-Filing Number

21-07-2025

Filing Number

1303/2025

Filing Date

22-Jul-2025

Registration No

71/2025

Registration Date

07-Aug-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Soundarrajan

    Adv. N Ramesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kasthuri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal District Court of Tirunelveli granted a petition to consolidate two execution cases (E.P. No. 16/2025 from the Additional Court and E.P. No. 17/2025 from the Principal Court) for joint hearing before the Principal Court. The court found that both cases involve identical parties and arise from the same underlying matter, making consolidation necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and potential conflicting judgments. The defendant raised no objection to the consolidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Principal District Judge

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  7. 15-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  8. 17-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge

  9. 07-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 22-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 71/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District Court of Tirunelveli granted a petition to consolidate two execution cases (E.P. No. 16/2025 from the Additional Court and E.P. No. 17/2025 from the Principal Court) for joint hearing before the Principal Court. The court found that both cases involve identical parties and arise from the same underlying matter, making consolidation necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and potential conflicting judgments. The defendant raised no objection to the consolidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case