S. Krishnasamy vs A. Kanaga Subbu Rathinam Advocate - S.HARIHARA RAMACHANDRAN — 97/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O 7, R 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG010020782023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
687/2023
Filing Date
27-03-2023
Registration No
97/2023
Registration Date
10-04-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Krishnasamy
Adv. A. Arockiasamy
Respondent(s)
A. Kanaga Subbu Rathinam Advocate - S.HARIHARA RAMACHANDRAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document from the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul records the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff witness in Original Case No. 97/2023 under the Indian Succession Act, 1873, Section 10. The witness's statement was recorded in open court on 02.09.2025, documenting evidence related to property succession matters through various exhibits including birth certificates, land records, and official communications from the Tamil Nadu Bar Council (dated 2021-2022). The court admission note indicates the statement was read over and confirmed as accurate by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document from the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul records the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff witness in Original Case No. 97/2023 under the Indian Succession Act, 1873, Section 10. The witness's statement was recorded in open court on 02.09.2025, documenting evidence related to property succession matters through various exhibits including birth certificates, land records, and official communications from the Tamil Nadu Bar Council (dated 2021-2022). The court admission note indicates the statement was read over and confirmed as accurate by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts