NIzar Ahamed vs S. Sulthan Mohideen — 161/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG010019082022
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
11816/2022
Filing Date
20-04-2022
Registration No
161/2022
Registration Date
21-04-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIzar Ahamed
Adv. O.Sahabudeen
Respondent(s)
S. Sulthan Mohideen
S.Shafi Ahamed
H.Nazir Ahamed
Niyaz Ahamed
Yasmin
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary O.S. No. 161/2022 | Dindigul District Court | 09-09-2025 This is a property partition suit involving disputed rights over ancestral properties (land and residential building). The court recorded cross-examination of the plaintiff and defendants regarding a 1976 settlement deed and subsequent gift deeds concerning property shares. The court examined contentions about inheritance rights following the father's death in 1998 and the mother's death in 2020, with disputes over the exact property shares of various family members. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination of the defendants' counsel upon request by defendants 3-5's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary O.S. No. 161/2022 | Dindigul District Court | 09-09-2025 This is a property partition suit involving disputed rights over ancestral properties (land and residential building). The court recorded cross-examination of the plaintiff and defendants regarding a 1976 settlement deed and subsequent gift deeds concerning property shares. The court examined contentions about inheritance rights following the father's death in 1998 and the mother's death in 2020, with disputes over the exact property shares of various family members. The case was adjourned for further cross-examination of the defendants' counsel upon request by defendants 3-5's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts