Selvakumar vs State through the inspector of police, Kodaikanal PS — 678/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 27(2),25(1)(a). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG010017152026

e-Filing Number

17-03-2026

Filing Number

890/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

678/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

Kodaikanal P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 27(2),25(1)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvakumar

    Adv. sathiskumar J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State through the inspector of police, Kodaikanal PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case 678/2026 Summary: Selvakumar petitioned to relax daily reporting conditions (appearing at Kodaikanal PS at 10:00 a.m. for 30 days) imposed during his bail in a criminal case involving Arms Act violations and assault charges. The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul dismissed the petition, rejecting his claim that the 30 km distance caused hardship and ruling that relaxation risked absconding given the serious nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 678/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 678/2026 Summary: Selvakumar petitioned to relax daily reporting conditions (appearing at Kodaikanal PS at 10:00 a.m. for 30 days) imposed during his bail in a criminal case involving Arms Act violations and assault charges. The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul dismissed the petition, rejecting his claim that the 30 km distance caused hardship and ruling that relaxation risked absconding given the serious nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case