Mariyadass Bruce lee vs Opiliya — 73/2022

Case under Indian Divorce Act Section 10(1)(x). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNDG010016952022

Filing Number

11733/2022

Filing Date

08-Apr-2022

Registration No

73/2022

Registration Date

08-Jun-2022

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Divorce Act Section 10(1)(x)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mariyadass Bruce lee

    Adv. K.Balamurugan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Opiliya

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In case IDOP.No.73/2022 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul, witness PW.2 (Vincent) deposed on 12.03.2026 and affirmed his statement in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The cross-examination by the opposing counsel was adjourned at the request of the advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  9. 22-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  12. 02-Aug-2025

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  14. 02-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  16. 30-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  17. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  18. 27-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  19. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  20. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  21. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  22. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  23. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  24. 18-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  25. 14-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Judge

  26. 11-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  27. 06-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  28. 03-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  29. 21-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  30. 11-Jan-2024

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  31. 01-Dec-2023

    Restored

    Principal District Judge

  32. 01-Dec-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  33. 01-Dec-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  34. 05-Sep-2023

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  35. 04-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  36. 05-Jul-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  37. 21-Apr-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  38. 10-Mar-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  39. 01-Feb-2023

    Counter

    Principal District Judge

  40. 05-Jan-2023

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  41. 08-Dec-2022

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  42. 07-Nov-2022

    Mediation

    Principal District Judge

  43. 29-Sep-2022

    Batta

    Principal District Judge

  44. 17-Aug-2022

    Batta

    Principal District Judge

  45. 14-Jul-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge

  46. 08-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 08-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 73/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In case IDOP.No.73/2022 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul, witness PW.2 (Vincent) deposed on 12.03.2026 and affirmed his statement in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The cross-examination by the opposing counsel was adjourned at the request of the advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case