Adhibathi Raja vs Sub-Inspector of Police — 620/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG010015852026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

818/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

620/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

615

Police Station

Dindigul Taluk P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Adhibathi Raja

    Adv. M SATHIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sub-Inspector of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul granted bail to Athipathi Raja (A1) in a burglary case involving theft of 28 grams of gold jewelry, despite prosecution objections about unrecovered case property and pending investigation with co-accused. The court found that after 78 days of custody, custodial interrogation was no longer necessary, and bail was appropriate under the circumstances. Conditions: Bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, no witness intimidation, with violation subject to cancellation by the Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 620/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul granted bail to Athipathi Raja (A1) in a burglary case involving theft of 28 grams of gold jewelry, despite prosecution objections about unrecovered case property and pending investigation with co-accused. The court found that after 78 days of custody, custodial interrogation was no longer necessary, and bail was appropriate under the circumstances. Conditions: Bail of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, daily police station reporting for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, no witness intimidation, with violation subject to cancellation by the Judicial Magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case