Kalilmuthu vs Sakthivel — 618/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430.1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNDG010015762026

Filing Number

809/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

618/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Dindugul

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kalilmuthu

    Adv. S. Dineshkumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sakthivel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 618/2026 because the petitioner failed to comply with a conditional order requiring deposit of 10% of the cheque amount before April 20, 2026 and did not appear for the hearing on April 21, 2026. The court found no justification to extend relief given the petitioner's non-compliance and lack of representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Principal District Judge

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 618/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 618/2026 because the petitioner failed to comply with a conditional order requiring deposit of 10% of the cheque amount before April 20, 2026 and did not appear for the hearing on April 21, 2026. The court found no justification to extend relief given the petitioner's non-compliance and lack of representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case