Karthik vs The Sub Inspector of police Vedasandur PS Dindigul — 245/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 30th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNDG010005512026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
337/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
245/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
Vedasandur P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karthik
Adv. Sankarguru Pushpanathan
Kishor Endra Thirumurugan
Adv. Sankarguru Pushpanathan
Respondent(s)
The Sub Inspector of police Vedasandur PS (Police Station) Dindigul
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge
Disposed
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 24-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 21-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 17-04-2026 | Mediation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul granted anticipatory bail to petitioners A1 and A3 in a fraud case involving alleged cheating of Rs. 22,00,400 in an oil transaction under BNS 2023 sections 318(4), 316(2), and 336(3). The court's decision was based on the absence of bad antecedents, the fact that co-accused A2 was already granted anticipatory bail by Madras High Court, and consideration of case circumstances. The bail was granted conditionally, requiring the petitioners to execute a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, surrender within 15 days, appear daily at the police station for 15 days, and refrain from tampering with witnesses or obstructing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Dindigul granted anticipatory bail to petitioners A1 and A3 in a fraud case involving alleged cheating of Rs. 22,00,400 in an oil transaction under BNS 2023 sections 318(4), 316(2), and 336(3). The court's decision was based on the absence of bad antecedents, the fact that co-accused A2 was already granted anticipatory bail by Madras High Court, and consideration of case circumstances. The bail was granted conditionally, requiring the petitioners to execute a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, surrender within 15 days, appear daily at the police station for 15 days, and refrain from tampering with witnesses or obstructing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts