Babulal vs Chitra Priyadharsini alias Bhavani Ganesan — 56/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNDG010004182022
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
205/2022
Filing Date
31-01-2022
Registration No
56/2022
Registration Date
09-02-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Dindugul
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babulal
Adv. S.Hari hara Ramachandran
Respondent(s)
Chitra Priyadharsini alias Bhavani Ganesan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge
Evidence
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 02-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Copy of Deposition
Case Summary In Original Case No. 56/2022 before the Additional District Judge (FAC), Dindigul, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of the first defendant (Vani Ganeshan) under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873 on 07.03.2025. The defendant's statement and supporting documentary evidence were admitted into the record. The case has been adjourned for cross-examination of the defendant by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In Original Case No. 56/2022 before the Additional District Judge (FAC), Dindigul, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of the first defendant (Vani Ganeshan) under Section 10 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873 on 07.03.2025. The defendant's statement and supporting documentary evidence were admitted into the record. The case has been adjourned for cross-examination of the defendant by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts