Inspector of Police Achirapakkam PS. vs Balamurugan — 193/2023

Case under Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2005 Section 7(1)(a). Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Service Pending Next hearing 29-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG150053862023

Filing Number

5385/2023

Filing Date

01-Sep-2023

Registration No

193/2023

Registration Date

01-Sep-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

446

Police Station

ACHIRUPAKKAM PS

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2005 Section 7(1)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Achirapakkam PS (Police Station).

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balamurugan

  2. 2.Asraf Ali

  3. 3.Mujipur Raguman

  4. 4.Suthakar

  5. 5.Aurn

  6. 6.Sakthithasan

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  3. 11-May-2026

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  9. 30-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  10. 04-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  12. 23-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  14. 23-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  16. 17-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  18. 14-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  19. 11-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  20. 09-Jun-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  21. 12-May-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  22. 15-Apr-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  23. 07-Mar-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  24. 28-Jan-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  25. 31-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  26. 10-Dec-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  27. 19-Nov-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  28. 22-Oct-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document contains witness depositions (PW 2 and PW 3) in Case CC 193/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Madurantakam, dated 22.10.2024. Two police officers testified regarding arrests made on 04.08.2015 when approximately 8 individuals, including Balamurugan, Asraf Ali, and others, allegedly gathered near Natarapalli Arch on the GST Highway and staged a protest demanding closure of liquor shops without prior notice. The witnesses testified that the arrested persons were detained for approximately 15 minutes causing minor traffic disruption; however, under cross-examination, both witnesses conceded they lacked direct knowledge of actual damages or whether the arrested individuals were affiliated with political parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  29. 22-Oct-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  30. 20-Sep-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  31. 27-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  32. 13-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  33. 13-Aug-2024

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  34. 09-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  35. 26-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  36. 03-Jul-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  37. 24-Jun-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  38. 10-Jun-2024

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  39. 14-May-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  40. 26-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  41. 02-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  42. 15-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  43. 27-Feb-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  44. 30-Jan-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  45. 15-Dec-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  46. 08-Nov-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  47. 03-Oct-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  48. 01-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 01-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 193/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This document contains witness depositions (PW 2 and PW 3) in Case CC 193/2023 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Madurantakam, dated 22.10.2024. Two police officers testified regarding arrests made on 04.08.2015 when approximately 8 individuals, including Balamurugan, Asraf Ali, and others, allegedly gathered near Natarapalli Arch on the GST Highway and staged a protest demanding closure of liquor shops without prior notice. The witnesses testified that the arrested persons were detained for approximately 15 minutes causing minor traffic disruption; however, under cross-examination, both witnesses conceded they lacked direct knowledge of actual damages or whether the arrested individuals were affiliated with political parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case