Inspector of Police Achirupakkam Police Station vs MICHAEL — 491/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG150027792025
e-Filing Number
12-11-2025
Filing Number
2779/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
491/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
172
Police Station
ACHIRUPAKKAM PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police Achirupakkam Police Station
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE ACHARAPAKKAM POLICESTATION
Respondent(s)
MICHAEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 02-03-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 491/2025 Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Madurantakam acquitted all four accused (Michael, Madan, Raswathi, and Kaathavarayaan) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 506(1) and TNPHW Act Section 4, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony (changing her account from initial complaint), lack of corroborating witness evidence on assault allegations, and concluded the charges were not adequately established under the burden of proof required in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 491/2025 Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Madurantakam acquitted all four accused (Michael, Madan, Raswathi, and Kaathavarayaan) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 506(1) and TNPHW Act Section 4, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony (changing her account from initial complaint), lack of corroborating witness evidence on assault allegations, and concluded the charges were not adequately established under the burden of proof required in criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts