Uma rep by her special power of attorney Rajkumar, vs Gubendiran — 1237/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNCG150026052025

Filing Number

2605/2025

Filing Date

27-Oct-2025

Registration No

1237/2025

Registration Date

27-Oct-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Uma rep by her special power of attorney Rajkumar,

    Adv. S.Subramanian,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gubendiran

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Uma v. S. Gubendran (Crl.M.P. No. 1237/2025) The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Maduranthakam allowed Uma's petition to use a photocopy of a cheque as secondary evidence in her Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 complaint against S. Gubendran for cheque dishonour dated 03.04.2018. The court found that the original cheque was produced and verified at the time of complaint filing, subsequently lost on 25.12.2019 (supported by a police complaint), and the photocopy retained on court record was admissible as secondary evidence. The respondent filed no counter-objection, and the court relied on High Court precedent establishing that such photocopies are admissible when the original's authenticity was previously verified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  13. 12-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  14. 31-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  15. 17-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  16. 03-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  17. 28-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  18. 14-Nov-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  19. 27-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 27-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1237/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Uma v. S. Gubendran (Crl.M.P. No. 1237/2025) The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Maduranthakam allowed Uma's petition to use a photocopy of a cheque as secondary evidence in her Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 complaint against S. Gubendran for cheque dishonour dated 03.04.2018. The court found that the original cheque was produced and verified at the time of complaint filing, subsequently lost on 25.12.2019 (supported by a police complaint), and the photocopy retained on court record was admissible as secondary evidence. The respondent filed no counter-objection, and the court relied on High Court precedent establishing that such photocopies are admissible when the original's authenticity was previously verified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case