Uma rep by her special power of attorney Rajkumar, vs Sivaraj — 1236/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 13th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNCG150026042025
Filing Number
2604/2025
Filing Date
27-10-2025
Registration No
1236/2025
Registration Date
27-10-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Uma rep by her special power of attorney Rajkumar,
Adv. S.Subramanian
Respondent(s)
Sivaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Orders |
| 17-04-2026 | Orders |
| 27-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1236/2025 The Judicial Magistrate court allowed Uma's petition to use a photocopy of a cheque as secondary evidence in her Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 complaint against G. Sivaraj for dishonored cheque dated 03.04.2018. The court found that the original cheque was produced and verified at filing but subsequently lost on 25.12.2019 (supported by police complaint), the photocopy was retained on court record, and the accused filed no objection. The court permitted reliance on the photocopied cheque as admissible secondary evidence, granting the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1236/2025 The Judicial Magistrate court allowed Uma's petition to use a photocopy of a cheque as secondary evidence in her Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 complaint against G. Sivaraj for dishonored cheque dated 03.04.2018. The court found that the original cheque was produced and verified at filing but subsequently lost on 25.12.2019 (supported by police complaint), the photocopy was retained on court record, and the accused filed no objection. The court permitted reliance on the photocopied cheque as admissible secondary evidence, granting the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts