Dhanapal vs Kamaraj — 81/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG150022372023

Filing Number

2236/2023

Filing Date

05-Apr-2023

Registration No

81/2023

Registration Date

05-Apr-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Conviction

Last updated 12-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhanapal

    Adv. Tr.K.Thilagaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kamaraj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Madurantakam Magistrate Court convicted Kamaraj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs.3,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the complainant proved all essential ingredients of the offense, rejected the accused's defense that the cheque was a security instrument unrelated to debt, and sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment plus Rs.2,50,000 fine as compensation (after crediting Rs.50,000 he had paid earlier). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  4. 11-May-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  5. 05-May-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  7. 27-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  8. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  9. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  11. 03-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  12. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  13. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  15. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  16. 13-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  18. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  19. 25-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  21. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  22. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  23. 09-Sep-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  24. 28-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  25. 28-Aug-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  26. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  27. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  28. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  29. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  30. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  31. 24-Jun-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  32. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  33. 23-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  34. 11-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  35. 23-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  36. 21-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  37. 12-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  38. 07-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  39. 08-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  40. 03-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  41. 02-Dec-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  42. 30-Oct-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  43. 23-Sep-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  44. 22-Aug-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  45. 22-Jul-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  46. 19-Jun-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  47. 16-May-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  48. 15-Apr-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  49. 11-Mar-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  50. 01-Feb-2024

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  51. 28-Dec-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  52. 27-Nov-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  53. 18-Oct-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  54. 14-Sep-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  55. 14-Aug-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  56. 28-Jul-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  57. 28-Jun-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  58. 24-May-2023

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  59. 17-May-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  60. 10-May-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. I, Madurantakam

  61. 05-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  62. 05-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurantakam Magistrate Court convicted Kamaraj under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs.3,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found the complainant proved all essential ingredients of the offense, rejected the accused's defense that the cheque was a security instrument unrelated to debt, and sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment plus Rs.2,50,000 fine as compensation (after crediting Rs.50,000 he had paid earlier). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case