Melmaruvathur Police Station vs SARAVANAN — 470/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(3),118(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG150018422025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

14-08-2025

Filing Number

1842/2025

Filing Date

19-08-2025

Registration No

470/2025

Registration Date

17-11-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

162

Police Station

MELMARUVATHUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(3),118(2)

Petitioner(s)

Melmaruvathur Police Station

Adv. Inspector of Police Melmaruvathur police Station

Respondent(s)

SARAVANAN

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Questioning

19-02-2026

Trial

13-02-2026

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Case 470/2025 Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam Judge: Selvi. B. Bavya Date: 23 March 2026 Decision The court acquitted accused Saravanan under BNS sections 296(b), 118(2), and 351(3). The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt because the complainant (PW1) recanted her statement in court, contradicting her original complaint that Saravanan had beaten her with a stick, causing fractures in both arms. The court found irreconcilable contradictions between her testimony and the investigating officer's evidence, noting that witnesses were inadequate to establish the charge. Consequently, Saravanan was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 470/2025 Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam Judge: Selvi. B. Bavya Date: 23 March 2026 Decision The court acquitted accused Saravanan under BNS sections 296(b), 118(2), and 351(3). The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt because the complainant (PW1) recanted her statement in court, contradicting her original complaint that Saravanan had beaten her with a stick, causing fractures in both arms. The court found irreconcilable contradictions between her testimony and the investigating officer's evidence, noting that witnesses were inadequate to establish the charge. Consequently, Saravanan was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case