Melmaruvathur Police Station vs SARAVANAN — 470/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),351(3),118(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG150018422025
e-Filing Number
14-08-2025
Filing Number
1842/2025
Filing Date
19-08-2025
Registration No
470/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
162
Police Station
MELMARUVATHUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Melmaruvathur Police Station
Adv. Inspector of Police Melmaruvathur police Station
Respondent(s)
SARAVANAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Disposed
Arguments
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 19-02-2026 | Trial |
| 13-02-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 470/2025 Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam Judge: Selvi. B. Bavya Date: 23 March 2026 Decision The court acquitted accused Saravanan under BNS sections 296(b), 118(2), and 351(3). The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt because the complainant (PW1) recanted her statement in court, contradicting her original complaint that Saravanan had beaten her with a stick, causing fractures in both arms. The court found irreconcilable contradictions between her testimony and the investigating officer's evidence, noting that witnesses were inadequate to establish the charge. Consequently, Saravanan was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 470/2025 Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam Judge: Selvi. B. Bavya Date: 23 March 2026 Decision The court acquitted accused Saravanan under BNS sections 296(b), 118(2), and 351(3). The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt because the complainant (PW1) recanted her statement in court, contradicting her original complaint that Saravanan had beaten her with a stick, causing fractures in both arms. The court found irreconcilable contradictions between her testimony and the investigating officer's evidence, noting that witnesses were inadequate to establish the charge. Consequently, Saravanan was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts