Melmaruvathur Police Station vs PURUSHOTHAMAN — 134/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),118(1),324(4),351(3). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG150011302025
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2025
Filing Number
1130/2025
Filing Date
26-06-2025
Registration No
134/2025
Registration Date
29-07-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
MELMARUVATHUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Melmaruvathur Police Station
Adv. Inspector of Police Melmaruvathur police Station
Respondent(s)
PURUSHOTHAMAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Part Heard |
| 26-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 14-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 05-05-2026 | Part Heard |
| 16-04-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 134/2025 This is a witness deposition proceeding before the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Madurantakam. Two prosecution witnesses (PW 3 and PW 4) testified on 14.05.2026 regarding an alleged assault by respondent Purushothaman on 29.01.2025 at Polamur village. Both witnesses corroborated that Purushothaman assaulted a person with a stick, causing injury to the left hand, and prevented the victim from moving, allegedly reporting the incident to police. No cross-examination by the defense was conducted, and the proceedings recorded the witness depositions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 134/2025 This is a witness deposition proceeding before the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Madurantakam. Two prosecution witnesses (PW 3 and PW 4) testified on 14.05.2026 regarding an alleged assault by respondent Purushothaman on 29.01.2025 at Polamur village. Both witnesses corroborated that Purushothaman assaulted a person with a stick, causing injury to the left hand, and prevented the victim from moving, allegedly reporting the incident to police. No cross-examination by the defense was conducted, and the proceedings recorded the witness depositions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts