Melmaruvathur Police Station vs RAMESH KUMAR — 64/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A),338. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 17-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG150006352025

e-Filing Number

28-02-2025

Filing Number

635/2025

Filing Date

24-Apr-2025

Registration No

64/2025

Registration Date

24-Apr-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

187

Police Station

MELMARUVATHUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A),338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Melmaruvathur Police Station

    Adv. Inspector of Police Melmaruvathur police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  3. 22-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    SUMMARY This is a witness deposition (PW 8) in Criminal Case 64/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Madurantakam, involving a fatal motor vehicle accident. A police investigation witness testified regarding FIR 187/2024 filed under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 304(A), subsequently amended to Section 338. The witness detailed the investigation process, including scene inspection, collection of evidence, autopsy findings (death of one Dillirani), motor vehicle inspections, medical reports, and the arrest of accused Ramesh Kumar on 25.06.2024. During cross-examination, significant inconsistencies were highlighted: discrepancies between the FIR complaint location details and the official record, the 39-day gap before vehicle inspection, witness credibility issues, and procedural irregularities in witness examination. The court noted potential fabrication of evidence and concluded the witness provided false testimony based on documentary materials rather than genuine investigation findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 19-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  6. 18-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  7. 09-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  8. 26-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  9. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  10. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  11. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  12. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  13. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  14. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  15. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  16. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  17. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  18. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  19. 10-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  21. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  22. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  23. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  24. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  25. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  26. 20-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  27. 11-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  28. 30-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  29. 23-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  30. 16-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  31. 25-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  32. 25-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  33. 21-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  34. 12-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  35. 12-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  36. 29-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  37. 23-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  38. 15-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  39. 01-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  40. 01-Jul-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  41. 04-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  42. 26-May-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  43. 24-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 24-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY This is a witness deposition (PW 8) in Criminal Case 64/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Madurantakam, involving a fatal motor vehicle accident. A police investigation witness testified regarding FIR 187/2024 filed under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 304(A), subsequently amended to Section 338. The witness detailed the investigation process, including scene inspection, collection of evidence, autopsy findings (death of one Dillirani), motor vehicle inspections, medical reports, and the arrest of accused Ramesh Kumar on 25.06.2024. During cross-examination, significant inconsistencies were highlighted: discrepancies between the FIR complaint location details and the official record, the 39-day gap before vehicle inspection, witness credibility issues, and procedural irregularities in witness examination. The court noted potential fabrication of evidence and concluded the witness provided false testimony based on documentary materials rather than genuine investigation findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case