Padalam P.S., vs Ramesh Advocate - Govindarajan — 42/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406IPC. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG150003842024
Filing Number
359/2024
Filing Date
06-Feb-2013
Registration No
42/2024
Registration Date
02-Apr-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
246
Police Station
PADALAM
Year
2010
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Padalam P.S.,
Adv. Asst.P.P. Gr.II
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramesh Advocate - Govindarajan
Case History
-
21-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jul-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
18-Jun-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
26-May-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
28-Apr-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
26-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
11-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
19-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
10-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
29-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
08-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
16-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
28-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
23-Oct-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
11-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
01-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
31-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
08-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
10-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
20-May-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
21-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
02-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
18-Mar-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This document records witness depositions (PW 1 and PW 2) in case CC 42/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Madurantakam. Both witnesses testified that they signed a document without understanding its contents after being approached by police, and during cross-examination admitted to providing false testimony in favor of the opposing party regarding an incident dated 20.05.2010. The court allowed cross-examination of both witnesses after finding their testimonies to be unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
06-Mar-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
13-Feb-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
23-Jan-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
31-Dec-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
10-Dec-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
21-Nov-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
22-Oct-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
15-Oct-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
26-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
06-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
02-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
12-Jul-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
05-Jul-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
03-Jun-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
02-May-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
02-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2024
This document records witness depositions (PW 1 and PW 2) in case CC 42/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Madurantakam. Both witnesses testified that they signed a document without understanding its contents after being approached by police, and during cross-examination admitted to providing false testimony in favor of the opposing party regarding an incident dated 20.05.2010. The court allowed cross-examination of both witnesses after finding their testimonies to be unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts