Inspector of Police Achirupakkam Police Station vs RANGAIYAN — 95/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4), 296(b), 115(2), 351(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNCG150003252026

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

325/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

95/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

Decision Date

25-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

286

Police Station

ACHIRUPAKKAM PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4), 296(b), 115(2), 351(2)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police Achirupakkam Police Station

    Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE ACHARAPAKKAM POLICESTATION

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANGAIYAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 95/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate II, Madurantakam acquitted both accused persons (Rangaiyan and Karayaran) of all charges under IPC Sections 329(4), 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) read with Section 4 TNPHW Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses provided conflicting and inconsistent testimonies regarding the alleged assault incident on 14.08.2025. Critical discrepancies existed between the complainant's statement and supporting witness accounts regarding specific details of the alleged attack, injuries, and the accused's involvement. The court noted insufficient corroborating physical evidence and determined that charges were not proven beyond reasonable doubt, hence acquitting the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  4. 23-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  5. 18-Jun-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  6. 18-Jun-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  7. 16-Jun-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  8. 16-Jun-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  9. 09-Jun-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  10. 04-Jun-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  11. 26-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  12. 26-May-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  13. 30-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  14. 10-Apr-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  15. 02-Apr-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  16. 23-Mar-2026

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam

  17. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 95/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate II, Madurantakam acquitted both accused persons (Rangaiyan and Karayaran) of all charges under IPC Sections 329(4), 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) read with Section 4 TNPHW Act. Key Reasoning: The court found that prosecution witnesses provided conflicting and inconsistent testimonies regarding the alleged assault incident on 14.08.2025. Critical discrepancies existed between the complainant's statement and supporting witness accounts regarding specific details of the alleged attack, injuries, and the accused's involvement. The court noted insufficient corroborating physical evidence and determined that charges were not proven beyond reasonable doubt, hence acquitting the accused under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case