Melmaruvathur Police Station vs Raja — 39/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304(A). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG150002512025
e-Filing Number
20-02-2025
Filing Number
251/2025
Filing Date
28-Feb-2025
Registration No
39/2025
Registration Date
28-Feb-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
194
Police Station
MELMARUVATHUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Melmaruvathur Police Station
Adv. Inspector of Police Melmaruvathur police Station
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raja
Case History
-
28-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Jul-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
07-Jul-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
02-Jul-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
23-Jun-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
09-Jun-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
26-May-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
30-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
16-Apr-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: 39/2025 In this witness deposition proceeding before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Madurantakam, witness Anbuzhagan testified on 16.04.2026 regarding a road accident involving three persons on 28.06.2024. The witness was declared hostile by the prosecution after initially claiming no knowledge of the incident, then admitting he had previously signed as a witness to the accident investigation but was now giving false testimony in favor of the respondent Raja. No cross-examination by the defense or re-examination occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
09-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
02-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
17-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
05-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
19-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
16-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
10-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
03-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
20-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
05-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
18-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
25-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
06-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
23-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
23-Oct-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
23-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
21-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
12-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
29-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
15-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
12-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
22-May-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
29-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
02-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
24-Mar-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
28-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2025
Case Summary: 39/2025 In this witness deposition proceeding before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Madurantakam, witness Anbuzhagan testified on 16.04.2026 regarding a road accident involving three persons on 28.06.2024. The witness was declared hostile by the prosecution after initially claiming no knowledge of the incident, then admitting he had previously signed as a witness to the accident investigation but was now giving false testimony in favor of the respondent Raja. No cross-examination by the defense or re-examination occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts