Melmaruvathur Police Station vs BALASUNDARAM — 33/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG150002342025
e-Filing Number
20-02-2025
Filing Number
234/2025
Filing Date
25-02-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
26-02-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
142
Police Station
MELMARUVATHUR
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Melmaruvathur Police Station
Adv. Inspector of Police Melmaruvathur police Station
Respondent(s)
BALASUNDARAM
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Restored
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-03-2026 | Restored |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case CC 33/2025 Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Madurantakam acquitted all four accused (Balasundaram, his wife, Thiruvenkatam, and Mangaiyaselvi) of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 294(b) (obscene speech), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant Baskar alleged the accused attacked him on 31.05.2023 after a dispute over fallen crops, inconsistencies in medical records, lack of corroborating physical evidence, and the complainant's retraction in examination rendered the prosecution's case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case CC 33/2025 Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Madurantakam acquitted all four accused (Balasundaram, his wife, Thiruvenkatam, and Mangaiyaselvi) of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 294(b) (obscene speech), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant Baskar alleged the accused attacked him on 31.05.2023 after a dispute over fallen crops, inconsistencies in medical records, lack of corroborating physical evidence, and the complainant's retraction in examination rendered the prosecution's case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts