Melmaruvathur Police Station vs BALASUNDARAM — 33/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),323,506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG150002342025
e-Filing Number
20-02-2025
Filing Number
234/2025
Filing Date
25-Feb-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
26-Feb-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
142
Police Station
MELMARUVATHUR
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Melmaruvathur Police Station
Adv. Inspector of Police Melmaruvathur police Station
Respondent(s)
-
1.BALASUNDARAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case CC 33/2025 Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Madurantakam acquitted all four accused (Balasundaram, his wife, Thiruvenkatam, and Mangaiyaselvi) of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 294(b) (obscene speech), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant Baskar alleged the accused attacked him on 31.05.2023 after a dispute over fallen crops, inconsistencies in medical records, lack of corroborating physical evidence, and the complainant's retraction in examination rendered the prosecution's case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
30-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
27-Mar-2026
Restored
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
30-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
27-Oct-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
27-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
16-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
28-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
19-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
31-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
03-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
26-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
17-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
05-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
29-May-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
29-May-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
09-May-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
25-Apr-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
05-Apr-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
24-Mar-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
26-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2025
Case CC 33/2025 Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Madurantakam acquitted all four accused (Balasundaram, his wife, Thiruvenkatam, and Mangaiyaselvi) of charges under IPC sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 294(b) (obscene speech), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). The court found that while the complainant Baskar alleged the accused attacked him on 31.05.2023 after a dispute over fallen crops, inconsistencies in medical records, lack of corroborating physical evidence, and the complainant's retraction in examination rendered the prosecution's case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts