Padalam Police Station vs SARAVANAN — 3/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNCG150001052025
e-Filing Number
02-01-2025
Filing Number
105/2025
Filing Date
30-Jan-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
31-Jan-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
PADALAM
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Padalam Police Station
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE PADALAM POLICE STATION
Respondent(s)
-
1.SARAVANAN
Case History
-
28-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-Jul-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
23-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
04-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
30-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
27-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
18-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
11-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
23-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
11-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
26-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 3/2025 — Padalam Police Station v. SARAVANAN This document contains witness depositions (PW 1-4) in a traffic collision case before the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Madurantakam, dated 26.08.2025. The case concerns an accident on 11.01.2024 involving Vedha George, where a three-wheeler collided with his vehicle near Posannayi. Multiple witnesses testified, though several admitted during cross-examination to providing false testimony to protect the accused (a relative). The witnesses acknowledged inconsistencies between their FIR statements and court testimony, and admitted giving statements without proper investigation protocols being followed. No final order/verdict is presented in this document—only witness depositions are recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
01-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
25-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
27-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
06-Jun-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
12-May-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
25-Apr-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
28-Mar-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
05-Mar-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurantakam
-
31-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2025
Summary of Case 3/2025 — Padalam Police Station v. SARAVANAN This document contains witness depositions (PW 1-4) in a traffic collision case before the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Madurantakam, dated 26.08.2025. The case concerns an accident on 11.01.2024 involving Vedha George, where a three-wheeler collided with his vehicle near Posannayi. Multiple witnesses testified, though several admitted during cross-examination to providing false testimony to protect the accused (a relative). The witnesses acknowledged inconsistencies between their FIR statements and court testimony, and admitted giving statements without proper investigation protocols being followed. No final order/verdict is presented in this document—only witness depositions are recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts