Govindasamy Gounder vs Sadhasivam Advocate - V.Agoram D1,D2, — 200583/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1ofC.P.C,25(b),27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNCG140004722014
Filing Number
200583/2014
Filing Date
15-10-2014
Registration No
200583/2014
Registration Date
28-10-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Maduranthakam
Judge
2-District Munsif
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govindasamy Gounder
Adv. K.Ayyasamy
Respondent(s)
Sadhasivam Advocate - V.Agoram D1,D2,
Athilakshmi
Kasiyammal
Muniyammal
Vendamirtham
Pachaiyappan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S.No.583/2014 Court Decision: The suit was dismissed. The court upheld the validity of a power of attorney deed dated 11.02.2009 executed by plaintiff Govindasamy Gounder in favor of defendant Sadhasivam, and consequently upheld the sale deed dated 24.08.2011 whereby Sadhasivam transferred the property to his wife (2nd defendant). The court rejected the plaintiff's claim that he intended only a mortgage deed, holding that registered documentary evidence prevails over contradictory oral testimony and that the agent's acts within the scope of authority bind the principal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.No.583/2014 Court Decision: The suit was dismissed. The court upheld the validity of a power of attorney deed dated 11.02.2009 executed by plaintiff Govindasamy Gounder in favor of defendant Sadhasivam, and consequently upheld the sale deed dated 24.08.2011 whereby Sadhasivam transferred the property to his wife (2nd defendant). The court rejected the plaintiff's claim that he intended only a mortgage deed, holding that registered documentary evidence prevails over contradictory oral testimony and that the agent's acts within the scope of authority bind the principal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts